The Efficacy of Ramelteon to Prevent Postoperative Delirium After General Anesthesia in the Elderly: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative delirium is common and serious in elderly patients. Several drugs have been proposed as potential prophylactic agents for postoperative delirium. Studies on melatonin receptor agonists showed heterogeneity in age, cognitive function, anesthesia, surgery, interventions, methodologies for assessing outcomes, and results. Our objective was to examine the effect of ramelteon to prevent postoperative delirium in elderly patients, including those with dementia. DESIGN: A stratified, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (UMIN000028436, jRCTs031180054). SETTING: Tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged older than or equal to 65 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. INTERVENTION: Ramelteon (8 mg orally) or placebo (lactose) for six nights (the preoperative night and five consecutive nights from postoperative day 1 to 5) at around 9 P.M. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were screened for postoperative delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit twice daily until the sixth postoperative day. Patients with positive results were referred to a consultant psychiatrist to establish the diagnosis of delirium. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were randomly assigned to receive ramelteon (n = 55) or placebo (n = 53). Most of the patients' characteristics were reasonably well-balanced between the two groups. The stratified log-rank test showed no significant difference in preventing postoperative delirium between ramelteon and placebo (χ2 = 0.30, degrees of freedom = 1, p = 0.60). The Cox proportional hazard ratio for ramelteon compared to placebo was 1.40 (95% confidence interval: 0.40-4.85, χ2 for likelihood ratio test = 0.29, degrees of freedom = 1, p = 0.60). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative delirium between ramelteon and placebo after general anesthesia in elderly patients.

Efficacy of melatonin and ramelteon for the acute and long-term management of insomnia disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Melatonin has gained growing interest as a treatment of insomnia, despite contradictory findings, and a low level of evidence. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA criteria, to assess the efficacy of melatonin and ramelteon compared with placebo on sleep quantity and quality in insomnia disorder, while also considering factors that may impact their efficacy. This review included 22 studies, with 4875 participants, including 925 patients treated with melatonin, 1804 treated with ramelteon and 2297 receiving a placebo. Most studies evaluated the acute efficacy of prolonged release (PR) melatonin in insomnia disorder. Compared with placebo, PR melatonin appears efficacious with a small to medium effect size on subjective sleep onset latency (sSOL) (p = 0.031; weighted difference = -6.30 min), objective sleep onset latency (oSOL) (p < 0.001; weighted difference = -5.05 min), and objective sleep efficiency (oSE) (p = 0.043; weighted difference = 1.91%). For the subgroup mean age of patients ≥55, PR melatonin was efficacious on oSE with a large effect size (p < 0.001; weighted difference = 2.95%). Ramelteon was efficacious with a large effect size at 4 weeks on objective total sleep time (oTST) (p = 0.010; weighted difference = 17.9 min), subjective total sleep time (sTST) (p = 0.006; weighted difference = 11.7 min), sSOL (p = 0.009; weighted difference = -8.74 min), and oSOL (p = 0.017; weighted difference = -14 min). Regarding long-term effects, ramelteon has a large effect size on oTST (p < 0.001; weighted difference = 2.02 min) and sTST (p < 0.001; weighted difference = 14.5 min). PR melatonin and ramelteon appear efficacious compared with placebo for insomnia symptoms with PR melatonin showing mostly small to medium effect sizes. PR melatonin for individuals with a mean age ≥ 55 and ramelteon show larger effect sizes.

Adverse renal effects of NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition by MCC950 in an interventional model of diabetic kidney disease.

Activation of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome has been reported in diabetic complications including diabetic kidney disease (DKD). However, it remains unknown if NLRP3 inhibition is renoprotective in a clinically relevant interventional approach with established DKD. We therefore examined the effect of the NLRP3-specific inhibitor MCC950 in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice to measure the impact of NLRP3 inhibition on renal inflammation and associated pathology in DKD. We identified an adverse effect of MCC950 on renal pathology in diabetic animals. Indeed, MCC950-treated diabetic animals showed increased renal inflammation and macrophage infiltration in association with enhanced oxidative stress as well as increased mesangial expansion and glomerulosclerosis when compared with vehicle-treated diabetic animals. Inhibition of the inflammasome by MCC950 in diabetic mice led to renal up-regulation of markers of inflammation (Il1ß, Il18 and Mcp1), fibrosis (Col1, Col4, Fn1, α-SMA, Ctgf and Tgfß1) and oxidative stress (Nox2, Nox4 and nitrotyrosine). In addition, enhanced glomerular accumulation of pro-inflammatory CD68 positive cells and pro-oxidant factor nitrotyrosine was identified in the MCC950-treated diabetic compared with vehicle-treated diabetic animals. Collectively, in this interventional model of established DKD, NLRP3 inhibition with MCC950 did not show renoprotective effects in diabetic mice. On the contrary, diabetic mice treated with MCC950 exhibited adverse renal effects particularly enhanced renal inflammation and injury including mesangial expansion and glomerulosclerosis.

Belzutifan for Renal Cell Carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease have a high incidence of renal cell carcinoma owing to VHL gene inactivation and constitutive activation of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α). METHODS: In this phase 2, open-label, single-group trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of the HIF-2α inhibitor belzutifan (MK-6482, previously called PT2977), administered orally at a dose of 120 mg daily, in patients with renal cell carcinoma associated with VHL disease. The primary end point was objective response (complete or partial response) as measured according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, by an independent central radiology review committee. We also assessed responses to belzutifan in patients with non-renal cell carcinoma neoplasms and the safety of belzutifan. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, 20.2 to 30.1), the percentage of patients with renal cell carcinoma who had an objective response was 49% (95% confidence interval, 36 to 62). Responses were also observed in patients with pancreatic lesions (47 of 61 patients [77%]) and central nervous system hemangioblastomas (15 of 50 patients [30%]). Among the 16 eyes that could be evaluated in 12 patients with retinal hemangioblastomas at baseline, all (100%) were graded as showing improvement. The most common adverse events were anemia (in 90% of the patients) and fatigue (in 66%). Seven patients discontinued treatment: four patients voluntarily discontinued, one discontinued owing to a treatment-related adverse event (grade 1 dizziness), one discontinued because of disease progression as assessed by the investigator, and one patient died (of acute toxic effects of fentanyl). CONCLUSIONS: Belzutifan was associated with predominantly grade 1 and 2 adverse events and showed activity in patients with renal cell carcinomas and non-renal cell carcinoma neoplasms associated with VHL disease. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme and others; MK-6482-004 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03401788.).

Belzutifan, a Potent HIF2α Inhibitor, in the Pacak-Zhuang Syndrome.

The integration of genomic testing into clinical care enables the use of individualized approaches to the management of rare diseases. We describe the use of belzutifan, a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of the protein hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF2α), in a patient with polycythemia and multiple paragangliomas (the Pacak-Zhuang syndrome). The syndrome was caused in this patient by somatic mosaicism for an activating mutation in EPAS1. Treatment with belzutifan led to a rapid and sustained tumor response along with resolution of hypertension, headaches, and long-standing polycythemia. This case shows the application of a targeted therapy for the treatment of a patient with a rare tumor-predisposition syndrome. (Funded by the Morin Family Fund for Pediatric Cancer and Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation.).

Indaziflam: Control Effectiveness in Monocotyledonous and Eudicotyledonous Weeds as a Function of Herbicide Dose and Soil Texture.

<b>Background and Objective:</b> The indaziflam herbicide has efficiency in the control of monocotyledons weeds and is recommended for some eudicotyledonous species. However, the efficiency of the control can vary to the detriment of the species, dose and soil texture. Therefore, the objective of the present work was to evaluate the effectiveness of the control of indaziflam herbicide for weeds species <i>Mucuna aterrima</i>, <i>Sorghum halepense</i>, <i>Ipomoea purpurea</i>, <i>Rottboellia exaltata</i>, <i>Urochloa decumbens</i>, <i>Merremia aegyptia</i>, <i>Cenchrus echinatus</i>, <i>Digitaria horizontalis</i>, <i>Panicum maximum</i>, <i>Tridax procumbens</i>, <i>Urochloa plantaginea</i> and <i>Eleusine indica</i>, besides elaborating the calculation of DL₈₀, DL₉₀ and DL₉₅ of the product in two types of soil. Material and Methods: Thus, experiments were carried out in a greenhouse, isolated for each weed species, in a completely randomized experimental design, with four replications and a 10×2 factorial scheme, with ten doses of the herbicide indaziflam (0 D, 1/16 D, 1/8 D, 1/4 D, 1/2 D, D, 2 D, 4 D, 8 D, 16 D, being D = 100 g ha¹), applied in pre-emergence and two contrasting soil textures (clayey and sandy). At 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and 56 days after weed emergence (DAE), visual control assessments were performed and in the last evaluation, the dry mass of the aerial part was performed. <b>Results:</b> The weeds of the Poaceae family showed greater susceptibility to the indaziflam herbicide, on the other hand, the <i>Mucuna aterrima</i>, <i>Ipomoea purpurea</i> and <i>Merremia aegyptia </i>weeds required a higher dose of active ingredient to be controlled efficiently. <b>Conclusion:</b> In general, the current study concluded that a lesser amount of active ingredient was needed in sandy soil than in clayey soils to promote adequate weed control. Therefore, the difference in the susceptibility of the studied plants as function of dose indaziflam, weeds species and soil texture.

Vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant usage is associated with increased incidence and progression of osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Vitamin K is hypothesised to play a role in osteoarthritis (OA) pathogenesis through effects on vitamin K-dependent bone and cartilage proteins, and therefore may represent a modifiable risk factor. A genetic variant in a vitamin K-dependent protein that is an essential inhibitor for cartilage calcification, matrix Gla protein (MGP), was associated with an increased risk for OA. Vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (VKAs), such as warfarin and acenocoumarol, act as anticoagulants through inhibition of vitamin K-dependent blood coagulation proteins. VKAs likely also affect the functioning of other vitamin K-dependent proteins such as MGP. METHODS: We investigated the effect of acenocoumarol usage on progression and incidence of radiographic OA in 3494 participants of the Rotterdam Study cohort. We also examined the effect of MGP and VKORC1 single nucleotide variants on this association. RESULTS: Acenocoumarol usage was associated with an increased risk of OA incidence and progression (OR=2.50, 95% CI=1.94-3.20), both for knee (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.67-3.22) and hip OA (OR=2.74, 95% CI=1.82-4.11). Among acenocoumarol users, carriers of the high VKORC1(BB) expression haplotype together with the MGP OA risk allele (rs1800801-T) had an increased risk of OA incidence and progression (OR=4.18, 95% CI=2.69-6.50), while this relationship was not present in non-users of that group (OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.78-1.33). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the importance of vitamin K and vitamin K-dependent proteins, as MGP, in the pathogenesis of OA. Additionally, these results may have direct implications for the clinical prevention of OA, supporting the consideration of direct oral anticoagulants in favour of VKAs.

Preventative effects of ramelteon against postoperative delirium after elective liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium was reported to be associated with increased postoperative mortality after liver resection. Therefore, it is crucial to prevent postoperative delirium in such cases. Ramelteon, an agonist of melatonin receptor has been suggested to be useful for preventing delirium. The aim of this study was to examine whether ramelteon is effective at preventing delirium after elective liver resection. METHODS: The cases of patients who underwent liver resection at Nara Medical University (Nara, Japan) between January 2014 and August 2018 were analyzed. During the period from January 2017 to August 2018, ramelteon was prospectively administered to patients who underwent liver resection [8 mg/day on the day before surgery and on postoperative days 1 to 3] (ramelteon group), whereas ramelteon was not administered during the period from January 2014 to December 2016 (control group). The perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 120 patients in the ramelteon group and 186 patients in the control group. No significant intergroup differences in background factors, including age, gender, and preoperative serological laboratory data, were detected. The incidence of postoperative delirium was significantly lower in the ramelteon group (5.8% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis revealed that being aged ≥75 (P = 0.002), being male (P = 0.020), cardiovascular disease (P = 0.023), blood loss ≥1000ml (P = 0.001) and the absence of ramelteon treatment (P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for postoperative delirium. CONCLUSION: The administration of ramelteon might reduce the risk of postoperative delirium after elective liver resection.

Pharmacotherapies for sleep disturbances in dementia.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances, including reduced nocturnal sleep time, sleep fragmentation, nocturnal wandering, and daytime sleepiness are common clinical problems in dementia, and are associated with significant carer distress, increased healthcare costs, and institutionalisation. Although non-drug interventions are recommended as the first-line approach to managing these problems, drug treatment is often sought and used. However, there is significant uncertainty about the efficacy and adverse effects of the various hypnotic drugs in this clinically vulnerable population. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects, including common adverse effects, of any drug treatment versus placebo for sleep disorders in people with dementia. SEARCH METHODS: We searched ALOIS (www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois), the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register, on 19 February 2020, using the terms: sleep, insomnia, circadian, hypersomnia, parasomnia, somnolence, rest-activity, and sundowning. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a drug with placebo, and that had the primary aim of improving sleep in people with dementia who had an identified sleep disturbance at baseline. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data on study design, risk of bias, and results. We used the mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the measures of treatment effect, and where possible, synthesised results using a fixed-effect model. Key outcomes to be included in our summary tables were chosen with the help of a panel of carers. We used GRADE methods to rate the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We found nine eligible RCTs investigating: melatonin (5 studies, n = 222, five studies, but only two yielded data on our primary sleep outcomes suitable for meta-analysis), the sedative antidepressant trazodone (1 study, n = 30), the melatonin-receptor agonist ramelteon (1 study, n = 74, no peer-reviewed publication), and the orexin antagonists suvorexant and lemborexant (2 studies, n = 323). Participants in the trazodone study and most participants in the melatonin studies had moderate-to-severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD); those in the ramelteon study and the orexin antagonist studies had mild-to-moderate AD. Participants had a variety of common sleep problems at baseline. Primary sleep outcomes were measured using actigraphy or polysomnography. In one study, melatonin treatment was combined with light therapy. Only four studies systematically assessed adverse effects. Overall, we considered the studies to be at low or unclear risk of bias. We found low-certainty evidence that melatonin doses up to 10 mg may have little or no effect on any major sleep outcome over eight to 10 weeks in people with AD and sleep disturbances. We could synthesise data for two of our primary sleep outcomes: total nocturnal sleep time (TNST) (MD 10.68 minutes, 95% CI -16.22 to 37.59; 2 studies, n = 184), and the ratio of day-time to night-time sleep (MD -0.13, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.03; 2 studies; n = 184). From single studies, we found no evidence of an effect of melatonin on sleep efficiency, time awake after sleep onset, number of night-time awakenings, or mean duration of sleep bouts. There were no serious adverse effects of melatonin reported. We found low-certainty evidence that trazodone 50 mg for two weeks may improve TNST (MD 42.46 minutes, 95% CI 0.9 to 84.0; 1 study, n = 30), and sleep efficiency (MD 8.53%, 95% CI 1.9 to 15.1; 1 study, n = 30) in people with moderate-to-severe AD. The effect on time awake after sleep onset was uncertain due to very serious imprecision (MD -20.41 minutes, 95% CI -60.4 to 19.6; 1 study, n = 30). There may be little or no effect on number of night-time awakenings (MD -3.71, 95% CI -8.2 to 0.8; 1 study, n = 30) or time asleep in the day (MD 5.12 minutes, 95% CI -28.2 to 38.4). There were no serious adverse effects of trazodone reported. The small (n = 74), phase 2 trial investigating ramelteon 8 mg was reported only in summary form on the sponsor's website. We considered the certainty of the evidence to be low. There was no evidence of any important effect of ramelteon on any nocturnal sleep outcomes. There were no serious adverse effects. We found moderate-certainty evidence that an orexin antagonist taken for four weeks by people with mild-to-moderate AD probably increases TNST (MD 28.2 minutes, 95% CI 11.1 to 45.3; 1 study, n = 274) and decreases time awake after sleep onset (MD -15.7 minutes, 95% CI -28.1 to -3.3: 1 study, n = 274) but has little or no effect on number of awakenings (MD 0.0, 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5; 1 study, n = 274). It may be associated with a small increase in sleep efficiency (MD 4.26%, 95% CI 1.26 to 7.26; 2 studies, n = 312), has no clear effect on sleep latency (MD -12.1 minutes, 95% CI -25.9 to 1.7; 1 study, n = 274), and may have little or no effect on the mean duration of sleep bouts (MD -2.42 minutes, 95% CI -5.53 to 0.7; 1 study, n = 38). Adverse events were probably no more common among participants taking orexin antagonists than those taking placebo (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.99; 2 studies, n = 323). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We discovered a distinct lack of evidence to guide decisions about drug treatment of sleep problems in dementia. In particular, we found no RCTs of many widely prescribed drugs, including the benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, although there is considerable uncertainty about the balance of benefits and risks for these common treatments. We found no evidence for beneficial effects of melatonin (up to 10 mg) or a melatonin receptor agonist. There was evidence of some beneficial effects on sleep outcomes from trazodone and orexin antagonists and no evidence of harmful effects in these small trials, although larger trials in a broader range of participants are needed to allow more definitive conclusions to be reached. Systematic assessment of adverse effects in future trials is essential.

Non-GABA sleep medications, suvorexant as risk factors for falls: Case-control and case-crossover study.

The aim of this study was to examine the risk of falls associated with the use of non-gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) sleep medications, suvorexant and ramelteon. This case-control and case-crossover study was performed at the Kudanzaka Hospital, Chiyoda Ward, Tokyo. A total of 325 patients who had falls and 1295 controls matched by sex and age were included. The inclusion criteria for the case group were hospitalized patients who had their first fall and that for the control were patients who were hospitalized and did not have a fall, between January 2016 and November 2018. The internal sleep medications administered were classified as suvorexant, ramelteon, non-benzodiazepines, benzodiazepines, or kampo. In the case-control study, age, sex, clinical department, the fall down risk score, and hospitalized duration were adjusted in the logistic regression model. In the case-control study, multivariable logistic regression showed that the use of suvorexant (odds ratio [OR]: 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-5.28), nonbenzodiazepines (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.73-3.59), and benzodiazepines (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.16-2.34) was significantly associated with an increased OR of falls. However, the use of ramelteon (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 0.60-3.16) and kampo (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 0.75-3.19) was not significantly associated with an increased OR of falls. In the case-crossover study, the use of suvorexant (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.05-3.00) and nonbenzodiazepines (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.17-2.27) was significantly associated with an increased OR of falls. Similar patterns were observed in several sensitivity analyses. It was suggested that suvorexant increases the OR of falls. This result is robust in various analyses. This study showed that the risk of falls also exists for non-GABA sleep medication, suvorexant, and thus it is necessary to carefully prescribe hypnotic drugs under appropriate assessment.

Association of Hypnotic Drug Use with Fall Incidents in Hospitalized Elderly Patients: A Case-Crossover Study.

We investigated whether use of hypnotic drugs, including benzodiazepine receptor agonists, as well as ramelteon and suvorexant are associated with fall incidents in elderly inpatients aged no less than 75 years, who were hospitalized at an acute care general hospital in Japan, between November 1st, 2016 and October 31st, 2017. Multivariate analysis results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Following to a case-crossover study protocol, the time windows of the case and the control days were assigned to the day or the days, which are one day or 2-8 d before the fall incidents, respectively. In the enrolled 111 patients, the accumulated total available numbers of the cases and the control days were 111 and 554 patient days, respectively. Hypnotic drug use was significantly associated with fall incidents (OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.03-7.90, p = 0.04). Especially benzodiazepine receptor agonists (OR: 5.79, 95% CI: 1.52-22.1, p = 0.01) showed statistically significant association with fall incidents. In contrast, neither ramelteon (OR: 7.95, 95% CI: 0.72-87.9, p = 0.09) nor suvorexant (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.06-1.06, p = 0.06) were significantly associated with fall incidents. Thus, benzodiazepine receptor agonists, but not ramelteon or suvorexant, showed significant association with fall incidents. Therefore, special care should be taken especially when benzodiazepine receptor agonists are administrated to elderly subjects. In contrast, fall risk may be much less in patients treated with ramelteon or suvorexant. These results could help us to conduct safer drug treatment for insomnia patients aged no less than 75 years.

A cell-based high-throughput screen identifies drugs that cause bleeding disorders by off-targeting the vitamin K cycle.

Drug-induced bleeding disorders contribute to substantial morbidity and mortality. Antithrombotic agents that cause unintended bleeding of obvious cause are relatively easy to control. However, the mechanisms of most drug-induced bleeding disorders are poorly understood, which makes intervention more difficult. As most bleeding disorders are associated with the dysfunction of coagulation factors, we adapted our recently established cell-based assay to identify drugs that affect the biosynthesis of active vitamin K-dependent (VKD) coagulation factors with possible adverse off-target results. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Collection (NCC) library containing 727 drugs was screened, and 9 drugs were identified, including the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant warfarin. Bleeding complications associated with most of these drugs have been clinically reported, but the pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. Further characterization of the 9 top-hit drugs on the inhibition of VKD carboxylation suggests that warfarin, lansoprazole, and nitazoxanide mainly target vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKOR), whereas idebenone, clofazimine, and AM404 mainly target vitamin K reductase (VKR) in vitamin K redox cycling. The other 3 drugs mainly affect vitamin K availability within the cells. The molecular mechanisms underlying the inactivation of VKOR and VKR by these drugs are clarified. Results from both cell-based and animal model studies suggest that the anticoagulation effect of drugs that target VKOR, but not VKR, can be rescued by the administration of vitamin K. These findings provide insights into the prevention and management of drug-induced bleeding disorders. The established cell-based, high-throughput screening approach provides a powerful tool for identifying new vitamin K antagonists that function as anticoagulants.

The effect of melatonin on delirium in hospitalised patients: A systematic review and meta-analyses with trial sequential analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Melatonin is an endogenous hormone, which regulates circadian rhythms and promotes sleep. In recent years, several randomised controlled trials examining the prophylactic use of melatonin to prevent delirium were published with conflicting findings. The primary aim of this review was to determine the effect of melatonin on the incidence of delirium in hospitalised patients. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were systematically searched from their inception until December 2018. REVIEW METHODS: All randomised clinical trials were included. RESULTS: Sixteen trials (1634 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Incidence of delirium was not significantly lower in patients who received melatonin, with an odd ratio, OR (95%Cl) of 0.55 (0.24-1.26); ρ = 0.16, certainty of evidence = low, trial sequential analysis = inconclusive. However, patients who randomised to melatonin had a significantly shorter length of stay in intensive care units, with a mean difference, MD (95%CI) of -1.84 days (-2.46, -1.21); ρ < 0.001. No differences were demonstrated in the need for physical restraints (OR 95%Cl 0.65; 0.31-1.37; ρ = 0.26) and the requirement of sedative agents (OR 95%Cl 0.86; 0.48-1.55; ρ = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the results of this meta-analysis of sixteen trials neither support nor oppose the use of melatonin in the prevention of delirium of hospitalised patients. We identified high heterogeneity across all the included trials and low certainty of evidence with potential type II error. Future multi-centre, adequately powered randomised controlled trials are warranted to provide more certainty on the use of melatonin for the prevention of delirium. PROSPERO: CRD42019123546.

Safety and Tolerability of the Chymase Inhibitor Fulacimstat in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Myocardial Infarction-Results of the CHIARA MIA 1 Trial.

The chymase inhibitor fulacimstat is developed as a first-in-class treatment option for the inhibition of adverse cardiac remodeling in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after acute myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of the study was to examine the safety and tolerability of fulacimstat in patients with LVD after remote MI. A multicenter, multinational randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed in clinically stable patients (40-79 years of age, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% because of MI in medical history) who were on stable evidence-based standard-of-care therapies for LVD post-MI including an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker at doses of at least half the recommended target dose. Patients were treated for 2 weeks with either placebo (n = 12) or 4 different doses of fulacimstat (5 mg twice daily, n = 9; 10 mg twice daily, n = 9; 25 mg twice daily, n = 10; 50 mg once daily, n = 9). Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated at all examined doses. There were no clinically relevant effects on vital signs or potassium levels compared with placebo treatment. Mean plasma concentrations of fulacimstat increased with the administered dose and reached exposures predicted to be therapeutically active. The safety profile and the absence of effects on blood pressure or heart rate in a chronic patient population having similar comorbidities and receiving similar comedication as patients after acute MI support future clinical trials with fulacimstat in patients after acute MI.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of the Novel Chymase Inhibitor BAY 1142524 in Healthy Male Volunteers.

The orally available chymase inhibitor BAY 1142524 is currently being developed as a first-in-class treatment for left-ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results from 3 randomized, single-center, phase 1 studies in healthy male volunteers examining the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of BAY 1142524 are summarized. In this first-in-human study, single oral doses of 1-200 mg were administered in fasted state as liquid service formulation or immediate release (IR) tablets. The relative bioavailability and the effect of a high-fat/high-calorie meal were investigated at the 5-mg dose. In a multiple-dose escalation study, doses of 5-50 mg twice daily and 100 mg once daily were given for 5 consecutive days. BAY 1142524 was safe and well tolerated and had no effects on heart rate or blood pressure compared with placebo. BAY 1142524 was absorbed with peak concentration 1-3 hours after administration for IR tablets; it was eliminated from plasma with a terminal half-life of 6.84-12.0 hours after administration of liquid service formulation or IR tablets. Plasma exposures appeared to be dose-linear, with a negligible food effect. There was only low accumulation of BAY 1142524 after multiple dosing. BAY 1142524 exhibited a pharmacokinetic profile allowing for once-daily dosing. The absence of blood pressure effects after administration of BAY 1142524 supports the combination of this novel anti-remodeling drug with existing standard of care in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.

Evaluation of patients' knowledge on their vitamin K antagonist treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are currently the most prescribed oral anticoagulant treatment in Tunisia. Despite the standardization of biological monitoring and the better definition of therapeutic objectives, their side effects are a frequent reason for hospitalization. AIM: To evaluate patients' knowledge about their VKA treatment. METHODS: We realized a cross-sectional descriptive study in the Cardiology Department of HabibThameur Hospital from September to October 2016. A questionnaire consisting of 14 items was used in a semi-directed interview in order to assess patients' knowledge on their VKA treatment. RESULTS: Our study included one hundred patients. Mean age was 61 ± 12 years and sex ratio of 1.8. Forty-eight per cent were illiterate. The median duration of AVK intake was 5 years. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was the most frequent indication (57%). Eighty percent of patients had more than five correct answers on the eight items of knowledge: VKA's name (96%), tablet description (93%), dose (99%), time (94%), VKA's effect (70%), INR (56%), treatment's risk (49%) and the target INR (20%). Twenty-two percent had more than four correct answers on the 6 items of know-how: what to do in case of haemorrhage (70%), what to do in case of oblivion (45%), interactions precautions to be observed with food (13%), activities advised against (49%) and medical procedures advised against (27%). In multivariate analysis, only prior VKA information was significantly associated with a better knowledge of VKA (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our patients' knowledge on their VKA treatment was insufficient to ensure the safety and efficacy of treatment. The creation of a therapeutic education program on is therefore necessary to reduce the iatrogenic risk of this treatment.